the SCBA’s resolution underscores a stark gender imbalance within India’s judiciary, an issue that has persisted despite growing advocacy for diversity and inclusion across sectors. While systemic challenges such as seniority norms and entrenched biases often complicate reform efforts, the absence of female representation at several High Courts is particularly concerning given broader goals of equity and judicial impartiality.Justice Pancholi’s controversial elevation highlights these complexities, raising questions about prioritizing merit versus fair representation-especially when three senior women were overlooked despite their qualifications. ensuring proportional representation requires deliberate policy changes from institutional bodies like the Collegium.
From a wider lens, diversifying India’s judiciary is not just about parity but also fostering perspectives that better reflect societal realities. Policymakers may need to revisit structural practices in judicial appointments considering statistical disparities highlighted by SCBA itself-only around 9% of current High Court judge positions are held by women.
For more details read here.