Supreme Court Permits Kerala to Withdraw Governor Dispute, Centre Stands Opposed

Rapid Summary

• On July 25, 2025, teh Supreme Court allowed kerala to withdraw two petitions filed against its Governor over delays in clearing State Bills.
• Attorney General R. Venkataramani cited an April 8 judgment on the Tamil Nadu GovernorS conduct as grounds for the withdrawal.
• The April 8 ruling prescribes a three-month deadline for Presidents and Governors to act on State Bills under articles 200 and 201 of the Constitution.
• Solicitor General tushar Mehta suggested tagging Kerala’s cases with a pending Presidential Reference before a Constitution Bench questioning timelines imposed by courts under Article 142 of the Constitution.
• Senior advocate K.K. Venugopal emphasized Kerala’s right to withdraw without any conditions attached, asserting that previous judgments had rendered its petitions infructuous.
• Justice P.S. Narasimha remarked in an earlier hearing that stopping Kerala from withdrawing its petitions would be “very, very challenging.”

Indian Opinion Analysis

The supreme Court’s decision allowing Kerala to withdraw its petitions against gubernatorial delays highlights ongoing tensions between states and Governors over legislative approvals-a recurring issue across Indian federalism discourse. The three-month timeline set by the court’s April judgment asserts judicial intervention aimed at resolving legislative bottlenecks but has also sparked a constitutional debate about separation of powers and judicial limits under Article 142.

While this case might bolster precedent linking executive accountability with timely action on State legislation,it also signals potential friction as constitutional questions raised by the Presidential Reference remain unresolved before a larger bench. ultimately, clarity from these deliberations could help define roles more precisely-critical for fostering smooth coordination between central institutions and States within India’s federal framework.

Read more