This Supreme Court ruling centers on jurisdiction rather than resolving ownership or usage disputes concerning musical works by one of India’s iconic composers, highlighting how complex copyright law has become in today’s creative industries. While Sony Music emphasizes its proprietary rights over specific works acquired through formal channels, IMMPL stresses overlapping judicial matters tied to earlier suits where aspects of moral and economic rights earned recognition.
The decision preserves jurisdictional conditions for ongoing cases but underscores broader systemic challenges artists face when protecting intellectual property, especially when disputes span multiple jurisdictions or relate to decades-old agreements. For India’s cultural ecosystem-where safeguarding creative ownership is vital-this highlights important gaps between historical practices versus new legal dynamics shaping content ownership today.
Read more at: Source