Fast Summary
- The supreme Court stayed the Calcutta High Court’s decision to halt the implementation of a revised OBC list notified by the West Bengal government.
- A Bench led by Chief Justice B.R. Gavai found prima facie errors in the high court order, terming it “surprising.”
- The revised OBC list contains 140 subsections under OBC-A and OBC-B categories, which were previously stayed by a High Court decision on June 17, 2025.
- Senior advocate Kapil Sibal argued for the state government, contending that reservations fall under executive functions.
- The revised list was prepared after a May 2024 High Court ruling quashed 77 communities’ inclusion in the previous OBC list.
Indian Opinion analysis
The Supreme court’s intervention underscores its active role in clarifying reservation-related legal disputes between state executives and judicial processes. This case highlights ongoing tensions over caste-based policies and their constitutional oversight. Given West Bengal’s socio-political landscape, decisions about including or excluding groups from affirmative action lists carry major implications for social equity and political representation. A final resolution will likely have broader repercussions for similar challenges faced by other states implementing or revising reservation frameworks.
Read more