The Supreme Court’s decision to issue notices regarding this presidential query illustrates its proactive approach in addressing constitutional ambiguities concerning governance processes between States, Governors, and higher offices such as the President. By keeping “all questions open,” it signals an intent for thorough deliberation without predetermined conclusions.
This case could have significant implications for federal relations within India’s constitutional framework if resolved definitively. It may clarify procedural expectations surrounding bill approvals at both state and national levels while balancing accountability across executive roles like that of Governors and Presidents.
Involving diverse perspectives-from States like tamil Nadu contesting judgments grounded in past case law (April 8 Governor ruling),Kerala questioning procedural validity,alongside assistance from India’s Attorney General-ensures thorough analysis of competing legal interpretations essential for crafting a stable precedent.