Quick Summary
- Tamil Nadu briefed the Supreme Court regarding a contempt petition filed against the State for appointing G. Venkatraman as Interim DGP on August 31,2025.
- The State informed that it has sent shortlisted names for regular DGP appointments to the UPSC.
- chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai directed UPSC and Tamil Nadu to expedite this process without delay.
- Petitioner Henri Tiphagne argued that ad hoc appointments violate the 2018 Supreme Court judgment in the Prakash Singh case, which mandates sending DGP proposals to UPSC three months before an anticipated vacancy and prohibits acting basis appointments for DGPs.
- Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi defended Tamil Nadu’s stance, stating that UPSC is aware of its responsibilities, but no strict deadline was imposed by the court.
—
Indian Opinion Analysis
the case highlights ongoing scrutiny of police leadership appointments under judicial oversight. The petitioner’s reliance on protocols established by the Prakash Singh judgment underscores growing demands for institutional compliance with court-mandated procedures aimed at ensuring clarity and stability at helm positions like Director General of Police (DGP).
For Tamil Nadu, adhering strictly to these procedures could strengthen governance credibility across states facing similar challenges. However, delays revealed in sending recommended names also raise concerns about administrative preparedness. Swift resolution by both UPSC and Tamil Nadu may positively reinforce public trust in constitutional adherence within India’s law enforcement infrastructure.
—
Read more: Link