– Recruitment involved a single multiple-choice written test.
– Viva-voce was entirely eliminated from the process.
The Supreme Court’s ruling underscores the importance of adhering to institutional norms when making high-stakes academic appointments. Violations of standard hiring procedures risk undermining constitutional protections under Article 14, which ensures fairness and reasonableness in administrative actions. By emphasizing both procedural integrity and long-standing practices, this judgment reinforces accountability for state authorities in shaping policy for public institutions.
While ensuring compliance with UGC regulations is essential to maintain academic standards, such verdicts can have broader implications.On one hand, it protects institutional integrity; on the other hand, it may disrupt livelihoods temporarily due to sudden invalidation of appointments. Universities across India might take this as a signal to reassess their recruitment processes sustainably while aligning them more closely with statutory guidelines moving forward.