– The Jagatika Lingayat Mahasabha (JLM) supports identifying as “Lingayat” and promotes it as an independent religion.
– The Akhila Bharatha Veerashaiva Mahasabha agrees with JLM on independence but favors “Veerashaiva-Lingayat” nomenclature.- Dingaleshwar Swami and Panchacharyas advocate unity under “Veerashaiva-Lingayat.”
The ongoing debate about Veerashaiva-Lingayat nomenclature speaks to deeper identity questions that transcend caste politics and touch upon spiritual legacy, socio-political dynamics, and administrative classifications. the issue highlights challenges in reconciling constitutional frameworks with diverse cultural identities in India.
At stake are practical implications such as census categorization impacting reservations or minority recognition-topics that intertwine with rumors affecting vulnerable communities’ perception of safeguards. From a broader viewpoint, efforts like Dingaleshwar swami’s Ekata samavesh or campaigns around Basavanna’s cultural icon status reflect attempts at unifying narratives from fragmented customary standpoints.
For policymakers navigating sensitive issues within diverse sociocultural groups like Lingayats and veerashaivas-neutral spaces fostering dialog seem vital to reach common ground without sowing division or misinformation during nationwide surveys.