Govt Approval Sought for Probe into Alleged Benami Deals of P.P. Divya, HC Informed

Rapid Summary

• The Kerala High Court was informed by the State government that the Vigilance department had sought prior approval to investigate alleged benami property deals involving P.P. Divya, former president of Kannur district panchayat.
• Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act mandates prior government approval for probing offences linked to decisions made by public servants during official duties.
• A petition, filed by P. Muhammed Shammas, vice-president of Kerala Students’ Union (KSU), claims attempts are being made to sabotage a Vigilance and Anti-Corruption bureau (VACB) probe into allegations against Ms. Divya concerning corruption and benami transactions worth crores.
• Shammas stated his complaint with VACB six months ago remains unacted upon, alleging political intervention derailed investigations. He also highlighted the removal and denial of a key post for former Vigilance Director Yogesh Gupta, who recommended filing a case after preliminary inquiry.
• The High Court has scheduled further hearings on September 18.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The developments surrounding allegations against former Kannur district panchayat president P.P. Divya raise crucial questions about openness and accountability in public office in India. Provisions like Section 17A under the Prevention of Corruption Act aim to balance investigatory processes with safeguards for public servants, but they may unintentionally create hurdles if misused politically or bureaucratically.

The petitioner’s accusations of high-level interventions stalling probes – coupled with claims about punitive measures against officials pursuing investigations – suggest concerns over institutional independence in such cases. Regardless of individual culpability here, safeguarding vigilance agencies from undue influence is vital for preserving credibility in anti-corruption frameworks.

As this case progresses toward its next hearing on September 18, outcomes may shape public perceptions regarding both governance systems and mechanisms enforcing accountability.

Read more: Published – August 26, 2025