– Policy risks sparking an arms race and escalating social polarization.
– Potential increase in gender-based violence and public safety issues.
– Calls for enhancing police and border security rather than arming civilians.
– Concerns about lack of clarity on eligibility criteria or safeguards for the policy.
The decision by Assam’s government reflects a complex balancing act between perceived community security needs and broader societal implications. Critics argue that arming civilians can escalate instability rather than resolve underlying issues. The opposition highlights specific risks including increased gun-related violence and strained inter-community relations – concerns rooted in lessons from conflict zones like Manipur. Strengthening professional law enforcement agencies might offer a more sustainable solution than weaponizing citizens. While the intent may aim at community empowerment, unchecked proliferation of arms could deepen socio-political divisions further compromising peace efforts made after years of militancy.